Manuscript Writing Service
International Journal of Surgery Science
Printed Journal   |   Indexed Journal   |   Refereed Journal   |   Peer Reviewed Journal

Vol. 8, Issue 1, Part C (2024)

Prospective comparative study between stamm’s and witzel’s method of feeding jejunostomy

Author(s): Dr. Hetvi N Marsonia and Dr. Jignesh P Dave
Abstract: Introduction: Feeding jejunostomy is surgical operation to create an opening of jejunum through an abdominal incision or endoscopically to establish enteral feeding. Feeding tube is a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, or are unable to swallow safely or need nutritional supplementation. After the introduction of this method in the past, over a period of time many modifications of this method came into view. Here we are mainly concerned with comparing only two methods stamm’s and witzel’s method out of so many different methods available for feeding jejunostomy.
Aim: To compare effectiveness and complications of stamm’s method v/s witzel’s method of feeding jejunostomy.
Materials and Methods: It is a type of comparative interventional study design. Total 50 patient’s were included in study, out of with 25 underwent for stamm’s method and 25 underwent for witzel’s method of feeding jejunostomy. Patient’s details including personal data, anthropometric data, disease history, various laboratory and radiological investigations, method used for creating feeding jejunostomy and its outcome including various complications occurred during a regular follow up of a patient for 3 months were entered into Microsoft excel sheet and was analysed using SPSS 22 version software. Study was done to Compare and contrast the two methods and final outcome including the complication frequency between the two methods of the feeding jejunostomy.
Results: Both stamm’s and witzel’s method are equally effective in improving nutritional status of the patient, however complication frequency for both sets were found to be different. Statistically significant association of tube dislodgement was found in respect to the type of method performed which is more common in stamm’s as compared to witzel’s method. Rest complications rates between two groups are comparable.
Conclusions: Both the methods have similar efficacy in term’s of it’s usefulness. Most of the complications were found to be related to technical errors except few such as tube dislodgement which is more common in stamm’s method. So the technique to which the surgeon is more acquainted with should be used.
Pages: 189-193  |  73 Views  27 Downloads


International Journal of Surgery Science
How to cite this article:
Dr. Hetvi N Marsonia, Dr. Jignesh P Dave. Prospective comparative study between stamm’s and witzel’s method of feeding jejunostomy. Int J Surg Sci 2024;8(1):189-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2024.v8.i1c.1070
 
International Journal of Surgery Science
Call for book chapter