Vol. 8, Issue 3, Part A (2024)
Comparison of efficacy of topical platelet-rich plasma in healing of split thickness skin grafting versus conventional split thickness skin grafting
Author(s):
Dr. Botla Lakshitha, Dr. AS Aishwarya and Dr. Suma Sree Pisupati
Abstract:
Aim: To study comparison of
efficacy of topical platelet-rich plasma in healing of split thickness skin
grafting versus conventional split thickness skin grafting, was conducted in the
Department of General Surgery, MNR Medical College and Hospital, Sangareddy.
Methodology: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted on 60 patients
with chronic leg/foot ulcers due to Diabetes, trauma and varicosity of veins. It
was conducted to compare the efficacy of platelet rich plasma versus the
conventional method of graft fixation, i.e., surgical suture and surgical staples.
Study population was divided into 2 equal groups of 30 patients each. Majority
of the patients were put on antibiotic cover as per the culture and sensitivity
reports. Daily dressings were done prior to grafting till repeat cultures
showed no growth. This study had a similar distribution of patients in terms of
age, sex, size of ulcer, type of ulcer and bacterial load.
Results: Most of the patients were
in 4th and 6th decade of life. All ulcer sizes in both
groups varied equal to and above 4 cm2 and largest measuring 10 cm2.
Swab cultures were taken from all ulcers at the time of admission and after dressings.
All patients were put on appropriate antibiotic therapy according to culture and
sensitivity report before the STSG. Organisms encountered were Klebsiella, Escherichia
coli, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and one case of
MRSA. Post-operative complications (seroma and hematoma formation) were less in
the PRP group compared to the Conventional group. 100% Graft uptake was
achieved faster with STSG fixation using PRP in comparison to the conventional
group (POD5 vs POD8, 50% of the patients had 100% graft uptake). Number of days
of hospital stay and cost of treatment were significantly shorter in the PRP group
when compared to the Conventional group. In this study, we have observed that
post STSG, seroma and/or hematoma formation was more in the conventional group
than in the PRP group. In the PRP group, out of the 30 patients, only 2 patients
had hematoma formations and 18 patients had no seroma/ hematoma formation at
the time of the first dressing and by the 5th post-operative day
100% of the patients had no complications. Whereas, in the conventional group after
6 days post STSG, only 50% of the patients had no complications.
Conclusion: Finally the study
concluded that PRP can be considered as a better option to the conventional method
(suture/staple) in fixation of STSG and is a rapid and safe method of management
of all patients with chronic leg/foot ulcers of diabetic, traumatic, and venous
origin.
Pages: 40-46 | 290 Views 98 Downloads
How to cite this article:
Dr. Botla Lakshitha, Dr. AS Aishwarya and Dr. Suma Sree Pisupati. Comparison of efficacy of topical platelet-rich plasma in healing of split thickness skin grafting versus conventional split thickness skin grafting. Int. J. Surg. Sci. 2024;8(3):40-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2024.v8.i3a.1093