Vol. 8, Issue 3, Part B (2024)
Laparoscopic versus open surgical outcomes repair for inguinal hernia: A combined prospective and retrospective cohort study
Author(s):
Md. Saiful Islam, Sayem Al Monsur Faizi, Mohammad Ziaur Rahman, Rana Jahangir Alam, Md. Jahangir Hossain and AK Al Miraj
Abstract:
Inguinal hernias are common
and have become a common surgical problem. In recent decades, the nature of
their treatment has changed and new research is constantly being conducted in
this field. To find out the assessment the laparoscopic versus open surgical
outcomes repair for inguinal hernia. A combined Prospective and retrospective
Cohort study was carried out February 2023 to March 2024 in Department of
General Surgery BSMMU. The sample size was two hundred for each arm; patients
aged 18 and above without factors pre-disposing to recurrence were included in
the study. The subjects were followed up for a period of one year at the end of
which primary outcome assessed was recurrence. A number of secondary outcomes
such as hematoma, persistent pain and return to regular activity were also
assessed. Among the 100 individuals analyzed, 75 (75%) were male patients, with
the majority of them falling between the ages of 41 and 55. In contrast to the
open group of patients, the laparoscopic group experienced a significant
increase in operative time with a highly significant statistical difference (p<0.0001),
and the laparoscopic group experienced a significant decrease in post-operative
pain score with an insignificant p-value. A significant statistical difference
(p<0.005) was estimated among the laparoscopic and open groups of
patients in terms of post-operative hospitalization. Returning to normal
activities was significantly different for laparoscopic patients relative to
the open group (p-value<0.001). With a high level of significance of p<0.001,
laparoscopic hernia repair required less time to recover before returning to
normal activities than open hernia repair (p<0.005). However, we
observed that 90% of the recurrences in the laparoscopic arm were at the hands
of surgeons with less than five years’ experience in laparoscopic surgery which
was statistically highly significant (P value = 0.00). In the open arm however,
the surgeons’ experience did not alter the outcome significantly (P value =
0.341). Thus, laparoscopic repair for inguinal hernia is a safe alternative in
the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Pages: 122-125 | 210 Views 94 Downloads
How to cite this article:
Md. Saiful Islam, Sayem Al Monsur Faizi, Mohammad Ziaur Rahman, Rana Jahangir Alam, Md. Jahangir Hossain and AK Al Miraj. Laparoscopic versus open surgical outcomes repair for inguinal hernia: A combined prospective and retrospective cohort study. Int. J. Surg. Sci. 2024;8(3):122-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2024.v8.i3b.1108