Manuscript Writing Service
International Journal of Surgery Science
Printed Journal   |   Indexed Journal   |   Refereed Journal   |   Peer Reviewed Journal

Vol. 8, Issue 3, Part B (2024)

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in control of hyperlipidemia versus laparoscopic gastric bypass one year follow-up

Author(s): Ahmed Raafat Saad Abdeen and Noha Abdullah Mahmoud
Abstract: Background:Hyperlipidaemia is a significant risk factor for all ischemic heart disorders and Hypertension, many research studies linked the majority of cases to obesity, there is across link between obesity and Hyperlipidaemia, so the lipid profile post-operative was examined in the most common bariatric surgeries. The purpose of this work was to conduct a comparison of laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for managing of Hyperlipidemia and related complications.
Methods:This prospective work had been carried out on 52 individuals aging between 18 and 65 years old of both genders, BMI of 30-45 kg/m2, A reported history of unsuccessful weight reduction efforts in the past, coupled with strong desire for surgical intervention. The study participants were categorized into two distinct groups: group I (n=26) consisted of individuals with obesity who received LSG, whereas group II (n=26) included individuals with obesity who received Laparoscopic Gastric bypass.
Results: The mean cholesterol levels following a period of 3 months were found to be 156.92±14.90 and 163.08±16.31 for the bypass and LSG groups, correspondingly. No statistically significant variation was seen among the bypass and LSG. The cholesterol levels following 3 months were favorable in all subjects who had bypass surgery, with 96.15% achieving a good outcome in LSG, and 3.85% experiencing a non-desirable outcome in LSG. The average triglyceride levels following a period of 3 months were found to be 129.23±13.47 and 144.62±14.21 for the bypass and LSG groups, correspondingly. A notable disparity was seen among the bypass and LSG. The Triglyceride levels seen following a 3-month period were found to be favorable in 92.31% of bypass cases and 57.69% of LSG cases, whereas they were deemed unfavorable in 7.69% of bypass cases and 42.31% of LSG cases among bypass and LSG. A statistically significant disparity was seen among the bypass surgery and the LSG procedure.
Conclusions: Gastric bypass was correlated with better outcomes contrasted to SG in control of hyperlipidemia in obese individuals. This is revealed in more loss following 1-year, better serum cholesterol and triglycerides following 3, 6 months, and 1 year.
Pages: 89-95  |  147 Views  84 Downloads


International Journal of Surgery Science
How to cite this article:
Ahmed Raafat Saad Abdeen, Noha Abdullah Mahmoud. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in control of hyperlipidemia versus laparoscopic gastric bypass one year follow-up. Int J Surg Sci 2024;8(3):89-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2024.v8.i3b.1098
 
International Journal of Surgery Science
Call for book chapter